Copyright L. Daniel Mouer 2008
“I'm not a big Belgian fan,” says Barstool #1.
“Oh, Man!, You don't know good beer! Belgians are the
best!”
Most home brewers and beer lovers know that some very
unusual, very characterful, brews come from Belgium. Most know, too,
that there are plenty of North American breweries doing their best to
mimic certain Belgian brews, or to take inspiration from some Belgian
beers for their own exciting and innovative brews. But what is it
that makes a beer “Belgian?” {Note: by “Belgian,” I mean
certain types of Belgian beers as well as brews that attempt to copy
them, or which are inspired by their unique characteristics.}
Well, of course, if a beer comes from Belgium, then
it's “Belgian,” right? Well, no. I don't think anyone would
consider Belgium's best-known and one of it's best-selling
beers—Stella Artois—as standard exemplary of “Belgian” beer!
Nope. It's a global, generic, pale beer like thousands of others
generally inspired by Bohemian and Bavarian lagers.
“Belgian” beers are all very high in alcohol,
right? Well, no. German doppelbocks, American imperial IPAs, and
British barley wines are all high-octane brews that no knowledgeable
drinker would mistake for a “Belgian.” Likewise, De Koninck pale
ale, the trademark brew of Antwerp, is a decidedly Belgian beer in
many ways, but it is also a beer of very modest gravity. Most folks
even recognize a distinctively English-ale heritage in De Koninck,
but it is, nonetheless, quintessentially “Belgian.”
It must be spices, then! Don't all
“Belgian” beers contain pepper or coriander or other spices?
Well, no. Spices are used in a few interesting examples, but, by no
means all.. That said, there is a certain “spiciness” that seems
to be nearly universal in those beers we define as “Belgian,” (or
“Belgian-like,” or “Belgian-inspired”). More about that
later.
Hey, I got it! Aren't those “Belgians”
all sour. Tart and funky? You know, full of lactic acid and
Brettanomyces yeast? Well, this description is valid for some
“Belgian” beers, such as the lambics, Flanders Sours and Oud
Bruins, but those are really a special class of beers that are not
what most folks think when they are thinking “Belgian.” As it
happens, these funky beers do share some characteristics with the
main line of “Belgian” beers, but those earthy and sour and
woodsy flavors and smells suggest that we set them aside as a unique
phenomenon distinct from the majority of “Belgians” we
beer-loving home brewers seek out and try our best to emulate.
Okay, so what makes a beer “Belgian?”
As I comb through my brewing library at the words of some of the
masters of “Belgian” brewing, I find lots of weasel words. Most
authorities recognize more variation than convergence in “Belgian”
styles. There are wide ranges of variation within many of the most
widely accepted style categories. As a beer judge in competitions, I
share others' frustration when trying to pin down BJCP style
guidelines while judging a flight of “Belgian” home brews.
That said, I love “Belgians,” and
as I try to tailor my own home brews to express the qualities I find
so attractive in “Belgian” beers, it dawns on me that there
really are a few characteristics that define the category. Before I
explore the specifics, let me clarify just what I mean by “Belgian”
beers. In BJCP terms, I am referring to the following styles: Belgian
and French Ales (Category 16) and Belgian Strong Ales (Category 18):
Belgian Wit (16A), Belgian Pale Ale (16B), Saisons (16C), Bières
de Gardes (16D), and Belgian Specialty Ales (16E), Belgian Blond Ales
(18A), Belgian Dubbels (18B), Belgian Trippels (18C), Belgian Golden
Strong (18D) and Belgian Dark Strong (18E) ales.
This is a lot of styles, and most folks
concede that even within these styles, there is huge variation. I
have not included the various sour beers. What's more, at least one
style category (Belgian Specialty Ales) is a huge, open-ended
catch-all that even includes fruit beers, stouts, and Scotch ale-type
brews.
So what do these beers share? It might
be easier to specify what they do not share. As noted above, it'd not
all about alcohol, although many “Belgian” styles are strong
beers. They do not share a color category, as “Belgians” run from
the very pale trippels and blonds, through the strong goldens to the
dubbels and big dark ales. Some catergories, such as saisons, can
come in nearly every color of the brewer's rainbow.
“Belgians” are Ales!
One thing that they all have in common,
however, is that they are ales. Some are bottle conditioned with
lager yeasts after primary fermentation with top fermenting strains.
Some, like bières
de gardes, are actually lagered, but they are, nonetheless, fermented
with ale yeasts. So, while the best-selling beers in Belgium might be
global pale lagers, like Stella Artois and Jupiler, these are not the
“Belgians” I'm talking about. Some “Belgian” ales are
fermented warm, and some are fermented quite cool. Some begin cool
and warm through fermentation. But all are ales.
As ales, they carry influences from
other ale-brewing centers, especially England and Scotland, but many
also share characteristics with German alts and Weissbiers. In fact,
one of the best ways to discover what elements are truly “Belgian,”
is to compare certain “Belgian” styles with their close parallels
from other brewing traditions.
For instance, pour a de Silly Scotch
Ale (a “Belgian” weighing in at about 8% abv) and drink it beside
a Belhaven Wee Heavy (from Scotland with about 6.5% abv). The Silly
is the “bigger” beer in alcohol content, and yet it is remarkably
drinkable and refreshing. There is plenty of sweet malt character,
but the beer slides down and finishes dry and clean. The Belhaven, on
the other hand, is thick, rich, luscious, syrupy. Tasty, yes. But not
exactly refreshing. It's full body and heavy sweetness almost makes a
bottle feel like a whole meal! Yes they are similar, but the Belhaven
is clearly “Scotch,” while the de Silly is certainly “Belgian,”
and it leaves you hoping for more.
For another example, try a Schneider
Edel-Weiss German Weissbier (white beer) alongside a bottle of
Hoegaarden Wit, a “Belgian” white beer. Both are made with wheat
(either malted or not), with very light pils-style base malt, and
with a light hopping of German or Central European hops. The beers
are similar in color and in cloudiness, but there the similarities
end. The Schneider is full in body, rich in flavor, and redolent of
rich cookie-like malt, clove phenols and banana esters. The
Hoegaarden, tastes light, crisp, peppery, with a hint of tartness
and the faintest suggestion of oranges. Finish the Schneider, and you
don't even need dessert. Finish the Hoegaaden and you'll be looking
around for a second glass.
Perhaps what makes the true
characteristics of “Belgians” stand out obviously is the
unexpected reactions we often have when drinking one of the stronger
Belgian ales, such as a Trappist or Abbey trippel, or a a strong
golden ale such as Duvel or Hoegaarden Grand Cru. The beers, with
alcohol in the 8-9 percent by volume range, clearly leave a warm
trail down your throat from the alcohol, However, they are not full
of, say, barleywine-style fruity esters or treacally sweetness. They
are very complex and full-flavored while, at the same time, being
light, refreshing, zesty and very quaffable. They finish cleanly and
leave you thinking about ordering a second 750mm bottle...uh, but
don't do that unless you have a trustworthy designated driver!
What all these beers share are that
they are ales brewed with a class of related yeast strains that
promote spicy flavors, and that finish with relatively low terminal
gravities. What's more, brewing techniques are selected to enhance
the light mouth feel and refreshing clean, dry finish that sets
“Belgians” apart. Mash temperatures are often on the low side,
chosen to produce highly fermentable worts with low dextrins.
Hops are typically way in the
background, often used for little more that to sanitize and stabilize
the wort, rather than to add bitterness, flavor or aroma. Many
traditional Belgian brewers use old hops that have lost much of their
aroma and flavor, just for that reason. While hoppiness contributes
to a dry sensation in many beer styles, “Belgians” are truly dry
by having very low residual sugar content, by leaving spicy flavors
in the brew, and by pumping up the bubbles! In fact, compared to a
best bitter on tap in a British pub, a typical bottled “Belgian”
has many times higher concentrations of carbon dioxide in solution.
,
Another contributor to the light, dry
mouth feel of “Belgians” is sugar. Relatively large amounts of
brewing sugars (not, generally, the rock candy sugar sold in home
brew stores) are used to thin the body and increase the alcohol
content. If the mantra of German brewers is the
Reinheitsgebot—nothing used but malt, yeast, hops and water—then
the credo of the “Belgian” brewer is throw in anything that makes
the beer lighter in body, drier in finish, and more complex in
flavor. If the yeast isn't quite spicy enough, then a little
coriander, or anise, or seeds of paradise might help. If your yeast
doesn't produce fruity esters because your climate is too chilly for
warm fermentation, then pare a little peel from a curacao orange into
the wort at the end of the brew.
No comments:
Post a Comment